CVE-2025-11935

With TLS 1.3 pre-shared key (PSK) a malicious or faulty server could ignore the request for PFS (perfect forward secrecy) and the client would continue on with the connection using PSK without PFS. This happened when a server responded to a ClientHello containing psk_dhe_ke without a key_share extension. The re-use of an authenticated PSK connection that on the clients side unexpectedly did not have PFS, reduces the security of the connection.

CVSS v3 7.5 HIGH

7.5^/10

CVSS v3 : HIGH

Vector :

Exploitability : 3.9 / Impact : 3.6

Attack Vector NETWORK

Attack Complexity LOW

Privileges Required NONE

User Interaction NONE

Confidentiality Impact HIGH

Integrity Impact NONE

Availability Impact NONE

Scope UNCHANGED

References

Link	Resource
https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl	Product
https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/9112	Issue Tracking Patch

Configurations

Configuration 1 (hide)

AND

cpe:2.3:a:wolfssl:wolfssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

OR	cpe:2.3:o:apple:macos:-:::::::*
	cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:-:::::::*

History

No history.

Information

Published : 2025-11-21 22:16

Updated : 2025-12-03 18:47

NVD link : CVE-2025-11935

Mitre link : CVE-2025-11935

CVE.ORG link : CVE-2025-11935

JSON object : View

Products Affected

wolfssl

wolfssl

linux

linux_kernel

apple

macos

CWE

CWE-326

Inadequate Encryption Strength

{"id": "CVE-2025-11935", "cveTags": [], "metrics": {"cvssMetricV31": [{"type": "Primary", "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "cvssData": {"scope": "UNCHANGED", "version": "3.1", "baseScore": 7.5, "attackVector": "NETWORK", "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "userInteraction": "NONE", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH"}, "impactScore": 3.6, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9}], "cvssMetricV40": [{"type": "Secondary", "source": "facts@wolfssl.com", "cvssData": {"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED", "version": "4.0", "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED", "baseScore": 6.3, "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED", "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X", "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED", "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackRequirements": "PRESENT", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "subIntegrityImpact": "LOW", "vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW", "integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED", "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE", "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE", "availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED", "subConfidentialityImpact": "LOW", "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW", "confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED", "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED"}}]}, "published": "2025-11-21T22:16:18.920", "references": [{"url": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl", "tags": ["Product"], "source": "facts@wolfssl.com"}, {"url": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/9112", "tags": ["Issue Tracking", "Patch"], "source": "facts@wolfssl.com"}], "vulnStatus": "Analyzed", "weaknesses": [{"type": "Secondary", "source": "facts@wolfssl.com", "description": [{"lang": "en", "value": "CWE-326"}]}], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "With TLS 1.3 pre-shared key (PSK) a malicious or faulty server could ignore the request for PFS (perfect forward secrecy) and the client would continue on with the connection using PSK without PFS. This happened when a\u00a0server responded to a ClientHello containing psk_dhe_ke without a key_share extension.\u00a0The re-use of an authenticated PSK connection that on the clients side unexpectedly did not have PFS, reduces the security of the connection."}], "lastModified": "2025-12-03T18:47:32.440", "configurations": [{"nodes": [{"negate": false, "cpeMatch": [{"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:wolfssl:wolfssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "EB81B784-14DD-4CD0-859A-62D42ADDD7D3", "versionEndExcluding": "5.8.4", "versionStartIncluding": "5.8.2"}], "operator": "OR"}, {"negate": false, "cpeMatch": [{"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:apple:macos:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": false, "matchCriteriaId": "387021A0-AF36-463C-A605-32EA7DAC172E"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": false, "matchCriteriaId": "703AF700-7A70-47E2-BC3A-7FD03B3CA9C1"}], "operator": "OR"}], "operator": "AND"}], "sourceIdentifier": "facts@wolfssl.com"}