Filtered by vendor Honeywell
Subscribe
Total
101 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-30315 | 1 Honeywell | 2 Safety Manager, Safety Manager Firmware | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager (SM and FSC) through 2022-05-06 has Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity. According to FSCT-2022-0053, there is a Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager insufficient logic security controls issue. The affected components are characterized as: Honeywell FSC runtime (FSC-CPU, QPP), Honeywell Safety Builder. The potential impact is: Remote Code Execution, Denial of Service. The Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager family of safety controllers utilize the unauthenticated Safety Builder protocol (FSCT-2022-0051) for engineering purposes, including downloading projects and control logic to the controller. Control logic is downloaded to the controller on a block-by-block basis. The logic that is downloaded consists of FLD code compiled to native machine code for the CPU module (which applies to both the Safety Manager and FSC families). Since this logic does not seem to be cryptographically authenticated, it allows an attacker capable of triggering a logic download to execute arbitrary machine code on the controller's CPU module in the context of the runtime. While the researchers could not verify this in detail, the researchers believe that the microprocessor underpinning the FSC and Safety Manager CPU modules is incapable of offering memory protection or privilege separation capabilities which would give an attacker full control of the CPU module. There is no authentication on control logic downloaded to the controller. Memory protection and privilege separation capabilities for the runtime are possibly lacking. The researchers confirmed the issues in question on Safety Manager R145.1 and R152.2 but suspect the issue affects all FSC and SM controllers and associated Safety Builder versions regardless of software or firmware revision. An attacker who can communicate with a Safety Manager controller via the Safety Builder protocol can execute arbitrary code without restrictions on the CPU module, allowing for covert manipulation of control operations and implanting capabilities similar to the TRITON malware (MITRE ATT&CK software ID S1009). A mitigating factor with regards to some, but not all, of the above functionality is that these require the Safety Manager physical keyswitch to be in the right position. | |||||
| CVE-2022-30314 | 1 Honeywell | 2 Safety Manager, Safety Manager Firmware | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager 5.02 uses Hard-coded Credentials. According to FSCT-2022-0052, there is a Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager hardcoded credentials issue. The affected components are characterized as: POLO bootloader. The potential impact is: Manipulate firmware. The Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager utilizes the DCOM-232/485 serial interface for firmware management purposes. When booting, the Safety Manager exposes the Enea POLO bootloader via this interface. Access to the boot configuration is controlled by means of credentials hardcoded in the Safety Manager firmware. The credentials for the bootloader are hardcoded in the firmware. An attacker with access to the serial interface (either through physical access, a compromised EWS or an exposed serial-to-ethernet gateway) can utilize these credentials to control the boot process and manipulate the unauthenticated firmware image (see FSCT-2022-0054). | |||||
| CVE-2022-30313 | 1 Honeywell | 2 Safety Manager, Safety Manager Firmware | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager through 2022-05-06 has Missing Authentication for a Critical Function. According to FSCT-2022-0051, there is a Honeywell Experion PKS Safety Manager multiple proprietary protocols with unauthenticated functionality issue. The affected components are characterized as: Honeywell Experion TCP (51000/TCP), Safety Builder (51010/TCP). The potential impact is: Manipulate controller state, Manipulate controller configuration, Manipulate controller logic, Manipulate controller files, Manipulate IO. The Honeywell Experion PKS Distributed Control System (DCS) Safety Manager utilizes several proprietary protocols for a wide variety of functionality, including process data acquisition, controller steering and configuration management. These protocols include: Experion TCP (51000/TCP) and Safety Builder (51010/TCP). None of these protocols have any authentication features, allowing any attacker capable of communicating with the ports in question to invoke (a subset of) desired functionality. There is no authentication functionality on the protocols in question. An attacker capable of invoking the protocols' functionalities could achieve a wide range of adverse impacts, including (but not limited to), the following: for Experion TCP (51000/TCP): Issue IO manipulation commands, Issue file read/write commands; and for Safety Builder (51010/TCP): Issue controller start/stop commands, Issue logic download/upload commands, Issue file read commands, Issue system time change commands. A mitigating factor with regards to some, but not all, of the above functionality is that these require the Safety Manager physical keyswitch to be in the right position. | |||||
| CVE-2022-30245 | 1 Honeywell | 1 Alerton Compass | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Honeywell Alerton Compass Software 1.6.5 allows unauthenticated configuration changes from remote users. This enables configuration data to be stored on the controller and then implemented. A user with malicious intent can send a crafted packet to change the controller configuration without the knowledge of other users, altering the controller's function capabilities. The changed configuration is not updated in the User Interface, which creates an inconsistency between the configuration display and the actual configuration on the controller. After the configuration change, remediation requires reverting to the correct configuration, requiring either physical or remote access depending on the configuration that was altered. | |||||
| CVE-2022-30244 | 1 Honeywell | 2 Alerton Ascent Control Module, Alerton Ascent Control Module Firmware | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.0 HIGH |
| Honeywell Alerton Ascent Control Module (ACM) through 2022-05-04 allows unauthenticated programming writes from remote users. This enables code to be store on the controller and then run without verification. A user with malicious intent can send a crafted packet to change and/or stop the program without the knowledge of other users, altering the controller's function. After the programming change, the program needs to be overwritten in order for the controller to restore its original operational function. | |||||
| CVE-2022-30243 | 1 Honeywell | 2 Alterton Visual Logic, Alterton Visual Logic Firmware | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Honeywell Alerton Visual Logic through 2022-05-04 allows unauthenticated programming writes from remote users. This enables code to be stored on the controller and then run without verification. A user with malicious intent can send a crafted packet to change and/or stop the program without the knowledge of other users, altering the controller's function. After the programming change, the program needs to be overwritten in order for the controller to restore its original operational function. | |||||
| CVE-2022-30242 | 1 Honeywell | 2 Alerton Ascent Control Module, Alerton Ascent Control Module Firmware | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| Honeywell Alerton Ascent Control Module (ACM) through 2022-05-04 allows unauthenticated configuration changes from remote users. This enables configuration data to be stored on the controller and then implemented. A user with malicious intent can send a crafted packet to change the controller configuration without the knowledge of other users, altering the controller's function capabilities. The changed configuration is not updated in the User Interface, which creates an inconsistency between the configuration display and the actual configuration on the controller. After the configuration change, remediation requires reverting to the correct configuration, requiring either physical or remote access depending on the configuration that was altered. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2333 | 1 Honeywell | 1 Softmaster | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| If an attacker manages to trick a valid user into loading a malicious DLL, the attacker may be able to achieve code execution in Honeywell SoftMaster version 4.51 application’s context and permissions. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2332 | 1 Honeywell | 1 Softmaster | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| A local unprivileged attacker may escalate to administrator privileges in Honeywell SoftMaster version 4.51, due to insecure permission assignment. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1261 | 1 Honeywell | 1 Matrikon Opc Server | 2024-11-21 | 9.0 HIGH | 5.8 MEDIUM |
| Matrikon, a subsidary of Honeywell Matrikon OPC Server (all versions) is vulnerable to a condition where a low privileged user allowed to connect to the OPC server to use the functions of the IPersisFile to execute operating system processes with system-level privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39364 | 1 Honeywell | 4 Hbw2per1, Hbw2per1 Firmware, Hdzp252di and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Honeywell HDZP252DI 1.00.HW02.4 and HBW2PER1 1.000.HW01.3 devices allow command spoofing (for camera control) after ARP cache poisoning has been achieved. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39363 | 1 Honeywell | 4 Hbw2per1, Hbw2per1 Firmware, Hdzp252di and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Honeywell HDZP252DI 1.00.HW02.4 and HBW2PER1 1.000.HW01.3 devices allow a video replay attack after ARP cache poisoning has been achieved. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38399 | 1 Honeywell | 8 Application Control Environment, Application Control Environment Firmware, C200 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Honeywell Experion PKS C200, C200E, C300, and ACE controllers are vulnerable to relative path traversal, which may allow an attacker access to unauthorized files and directories. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38397 | 1 Honeywell | 8 Application Control Environment, Application Control Environment Firmware, C200 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| Honeywell Experion PKS C200, C200E, C300, and ACE controllers are vulnerable to unrestricted file uploads, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code and cause a denial-of-service condition. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38395 | 1 Honeywell | 8 Application Control Environment, Application Control Environment Firmware, C200 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Honeywell Experion PKS C200, C200E, C300, and ACE controllers are vulnerable to improper neutralization of special elements in output, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code and cause a denial-of-service condition. | |||||
| CVE-2020-7005 | 1 Honeywell | 1 Win-pak | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| In Honeywell WIN-PAK 4.7.2, Web and prior versions, the affected product is vulnerable to a cross-site request forgery, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2020-6982 | 1 Honeywell | 1 Win-pak | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| In Honeywell WIN-PAK 4.7.2, Web and prior versions, the header injection vulnerability has been identified, which may allow remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2020-6978 | 1 Honeywell | 1 Win-pak | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| In Honeywell WIN-PAK 4.7.2, Web and prior versions, the affected product is vulnerable due to the usage of old jQuery libraries. | |||||
| CVE-2020-6974 | 1 Honeywell | 1 Notifier Webserver | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Honeywell Notifier Web Server (NWS) Version 3.50 is vulnerable to a path traversal attack, which allows an attacker to bypass access to restricted directories. Honeywell has released a firmware update to address the problem. | |||||
| CVE-2020-6972 | 1 Honeywell | 1 Notifier Webserver | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| In Notifier Web Server (NWS) Version 3.50 and earlier, the Honeywell Fire Web Server’s authentication may be bypassed by a capture-replay attack from a web browser. | |||||