Total
8709 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-67709 | 3 Esri, Linux, Microsoft | 3 Arcgis Server, Linux Kernel, Windows | 2026-01-06 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| There is a stored cross site scripting issue in Esri ArcGIS Server 11.4 and earlier on Windows and Linux that in some configurations allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to store files that contain malicious code that may execute in the context of a victim’s browser. | |||||
| CVE-2025-67710 | 3 Esri, Linux, Microsoft | 3 Arcgis Server, Linux Kernel, Windows | 2026-01-06 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| There is a stored cross site scripting issue in Esri ArcGIS Server 11.4 and earlier on Windows and Linux that in some configurations allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to store files that contain malicious code that may execute in the context of a victim’s browser. | |||||
| CVE-2025-67711 | 3 Esri, Linux, Microsoft | 3 Arcgis Server, Linux Kernel, Windows | 2026-01-06 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| There is a stored cross site scripting issue in Esri ArcGIS Server 11.4 and earlier on Windows and Linux that in some configurations allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to store files that contain malicious code that may execute in the context of a victim’s browser. | |||||
| CVE-2025-55309 | 3 Apple, Foxit, Microsoft | 4 Macos, Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader and 1 more | 2026-01-06 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PDF and Editor for Windows and macOS before 13.2 and 2025 before 2025.2. A crafted PDF can contain JavaScript that attaches an OnBlur action on a form field that destroys an annotation. During user right-click interaction, the program's internal focus change handling prematurely releases the annotation object, resulting in a use-after-free vulnerability that may cause memory corruption or application crashes. | |||||
| CVE-2025-55308 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2026-01-06 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PDF and Editor for Windows before 13.2 and 2025 before 2025.2. A crafted PDF containing JavaScript that calls closeDoc() while internal objects are still in use can cause premature release of these objects. This use-after-free vulnerability may lead to memory corruption, potentially resulting in information disclosure when the PDF is opened. | |||||
| CVE-2025-55307 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2026-01-06 | N/A | 3.3 LOW |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PDF and Editor for Windows before 13.2 and 2025 before 2025.2. Opening a malicious PDF containing a crafted JavaScript call to search.query() with a crafted cDIPath parameter (e.g., "/") may cause an out-of-bounds read in internal path-parsing logic, potentially leading to information disclosure or memory corruption. | |||||
| CVE-2025-66723 | 3 Apple, Inmusicbrands, Microsoft | 3 Macos, Engine Dj Desktop, Windows | 2026-01-05 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| inMusic Brands Engine DJ before 4.3.4 suffers from Insecure Permissions due to exposed HTTP service in the Remote Library, which allows attackers to access all files and network paths. | |||||
| CVE-2024-24576 | 3 Fedoraproject, Microsoft, Rust-lang | 3 Fedora, Windows, Rust | 2026-01-05 | N/A | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| Rust is a programming language. The Rust Security Response WG was notified that the Rust standard library prior to version 1.77.2 did not properly escape arguments when invoking batch files (with the `bat` and `cmd` extensions) on Windows using the `Command`. An attacker able to control the arguments passed to the spawned process could execute arbitrary shell commands by bypassing the escaping. The severity of this vulnerability is critical for those who invoke batch files on Windows with untrusted arguments. No other platform or use is affected. The `Command::arg` and `Command::args` APIs state in their documentation that the arguments will be passed to the spawned process as-is, regardless of the content of the arguments, and will not be evaluated by a shell. This means it should be safe to pass untrusted input as an argument. On Windows, the implementation of this is more complex than other platforms, because the Windows API only provides a single string containing all the arguments to the spawned process, and it's up to the spawned process to split them. Most programs use the standard C run-time argv, which in practice results in a mostly consistent way arguments are splitted. One exception though is `cmd.exe` (used among other things to execute batch files), which has its own argument splitting logic. That forces the standard library to implement custom escaping for arguments passed to batch files. Unfortunately it was reported that our escaping logic was not thorough enough, and it was possible to pass malicious arguments that would result in arbitrary shell execution. Due to the complexity of `cmd.exe`, we didn't identify a solution that would correctly escape arguments in all cases. To maintain our API guarantees, we improved the robustness of the escaping code, and changed the `Command` API to return an `InvalidInput` error when it cannot safely escape an argument. This error will be emitted when spawning the process. The fix is included in Rust 1.77.2. Note that the new escaping logic for batch files errs on the conservative side, and could reject valid arguments. Those who implement the escaping themselves or only handle trusted inputs on Windows can also use the `CommandExt::raw_arg` method to bypass the standard library's escaping logic. | |||||
| CVE-2025-64298 | 2 Microsoft, Mirion | 2 Windows, Biodose\/nmis | 2026-01-02 | N/A | 8.4 HIGH |
| NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous version installations where the embedded Microsoft SQLServer Express is used are exposed in the Windows share accessed by clients in networked installs. By default, this directory has insecure directory paths that allow access to the SQL Server database and configuration files, which can contain sensitive data. | |||||
| CVE-2025-53000 | 2 Jupyter, Microsoft | 2 Nbconvert, Windows | 2026-01-02 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| The nbconvert tool, jupyter nbconvert, converts Jupyter notebooks to various other formats via Jinja templates. Versions of nbconvert up to and including 7.16.6 on Windows have a vulnerability in which converting a notebook containing SVG output to a PDF results in unauthorized code execution. Specifically, a third party can create a `inkscape.bat` file that defines a Windows batch script, capable of arbitrary code execution. When a user runs `jupyter nbconvert --to pdf` on a notebook containing SVG output to a PDF on a Windows platform from this directory, the `inkscape.bat` file is run unexpectedly. As of time of publication, no known patches exist. | |||||
| CVE-2025-66499 | 3 Apple, Foxit, Microsoft | 4 Macos, Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader and 1 more | 2025-12-23 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the PDF parsing of Foxit PDF Reader when processing specially crafted JBIG2 data. An integer overflow in the calculation of the image buffer size may occur, potentially allowing a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2025-66497 | 3 Apple, Foxit, Microsoft | 4 Macos, Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader and 1 more | 2025-12-23 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A memory corruption vulnerability exists in the 3D annotation handling of Foxit PDF Reader due to insufficient bounds checking when parsing PRC data. When opening a PDF file containing malformed or specially crafted PRC content, out-of-bounds memory access may occur, resulting in memory corruption. | |||||
| CVE-2025-66498 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2025-12-23 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A memory corruption vulnerability exists in the 3D annotation handling of Foxit PDF Reader due to insufficient bounds checking when parsing U3D data. When opening a PDF file containing malformed or specially crafted PRC content, out-of-bounds memory access may occur, resulting in memory corruption. | |||||
| CVE-2025-66496 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2025-12-23 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A memory corruption vulnerability exists in the 3D annotation handling of Foxit PDF Reader due to insufficient bounds checking when parsing PRC data. When opening a PDF file containing malformed or specially crafted PRC content, out-of-bounds memory access may occur, resulting in memory corruption. | |||||
| CVE-2025-66494 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2025-12-23 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A use-after-free vulnerability exists in the PDF file parsing of Foxit PDF Reader before 2025.2.1, 14.0.1, and 13.2.1 on Windows. A PDF object managed by multiple parent objects could be freed while still being referenced, potentially allowing a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2025-66495 | 3 Apple, Foxit, Microsoft | 4 Macos, Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader and 1 more | 2025-12-23 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A use-after-free vulnerability exists in the annotation handling of Foxit PDF Reader before 2025.2.1, 14.0.1, and 13.2.1 on Windows and MacOS. When opening a PDF containing specially crafted JavaScript, a pointer to memory that has already been freed may be accessed or dereferenced, potentially allowing a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2025-66493 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2025-12-23 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A use-after-free vulnerability exists in the AcroForm handling of Foxit PDF Reader and Foxit PDF Editor before 2025.2.1,14.0.1 and 13.2.1 on Windows . When opening a PDF containing specially crafted JavaScript, a pointer to memory that has already been freed may be accessed or dereferenced, potentially allowing a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2025-13941 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2025-12-23 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A local privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Foxit PDF Reader/Editor Update Service. During plugin installation, incorrect file system permissions are assigned to resources used by the update service. A local attacker with low privileges could modify or replace these resources, which are later executed by the service, resulting in execution of arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2025-14766 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2025-12-23 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | |||||
| CVE-2025-14372 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2025-12-19 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Use after free in Password Manager in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.110 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||