Total
38 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2011-1430 | 1 Ipswitch | 1 Imail | 2025-04-11 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The STARTTLS implementation in the server in Ipswitch IMail 11.03 and earlier does not properly restrict I/O buffering, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to insert commands into encrypted SMTP sessions by sending a cleartext command that is processed after TLS is in place, related to a "plaintext command injection" attack, a similar issue to CVE-2011-0411. | |||||
| CVE-2007-2795 | 1 Ipswitch | 1 Imail | 2025-04-09 | 9.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Multiple buffer overflows in Ipswitch IMail before 2006.21 allow remote attackers or authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via (1) the authentication feature in IMailsec.dll, which triggers heap corruption in the IMail Server, or (2) a long SUBSCRIBE IMAP command, which triggers a stack-based buffer overflow in the IMAP Daemon. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5094 | 1 Ipswitch | 1 Imail | 2025-04-09 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in iaspam.dll in the SMTP Server in Ipswitch IMail Server 8.01 through 8.11 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a set of four different e-mail messages with a long boundary parameter in a certain malformed Content-Type header line, the string "MIME" by itself on a line in the header, and a long Content-Transfer-Encoding header line. | |||||
| CVE-2007-1637 | 1 Ipswitch | 4 Imail, Imail Plus, Imail Premium and 1 more | 2025-04-09 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
| Multiple buffer overflows in the IMAILAPILib ActiveX control (IMailAPI.dll) in Ipswitch IMail Server before 2006.2 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the (1) WebConnect and (2) Connect members in the (a) IMailServer control; (3) Sync3 and (4) Init3 members in the (b) IMailLDAPService control; and the (5) SetReplyTo member in the (c) IMailUserCollection control. | |||||
| CVE-2001-0494 | 1 Ipswitch | 1 Imail | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in IPSwitch IMail SMTP server 6.06 and possibly prior versions allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long From: header. | |||||
| CVE-2004-1520 | 1 Ipswitch | 1 Imail | 2025-04-03 | 4.6 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in IPSwitch IMail 8.13 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a long IMAP DELETE command. | |||||
| CVE-2001-1280 | 1 Ipswitch | 1 Imail | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| POP3 Server for Ipswitch IMail 7.04 and earlier generates different responses to valid and invalid user names, which allows remote attackers to determine users on the system. | |||||
| CVE-2004-2422 | 1 Ipswitch | 1 Imail | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple features in Ipswitch IMail Server before 8.13 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via (1) a long sender field to the Queue Manager or (2) a long To field to the Web Messaging component. | |||||
| CVE-1999-1046 | 1 Ipswitch | 1 Imail | 2025-04-03 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in IMonitor in IMail 5.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service, and possibly execute arbitrary commands, via a long string to port 8181. | |||||
| CVE-2005-1255 | 1 Ipswitch | 3 Imail, Imail Server, Ipswitch Collaboration Suite | 2025-04-03 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the IMAP server in IMail 8.12 and 8.13 in Ipswitch Collaboration Suite (ICS), and other versions before IMail Server 8.2 Hotfix 2, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a LOGIN command with (1) a long username argument or (2) a long username argument that begins with a special character. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0056 | 1 Ipswitch | 1 Imail | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| IMail IMONITOR status.cgi CGI script allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service with many calls to status.cgi. | |||||
| CVE-1999-1170 | 2 Ipswitch, Progress | 2 Imail, Ws Ftp Server | 2025-04-03 | 4.6 MEDIUM | N/A |
| IPswitch IMail allows local users to gain additional privileges and modify or add mail accounts by setting the "flags" registry key to 1920. | |||||
| CVE-1999-1551 | 1 Ipswitch | 1 Imail | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in Ipswitch IMail Service 5.0 allows an attacker to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary commands via a long URL. | |||||
| CVE-1999-1171 | 2 Ipswitch, Progress | 2 Imail, Ws Ftp Server | 2025-04-03 | 4.6 MEDIUM | N/A |
| IPswitch WS_FTP allows local users to gain additional privileges and modify or add mail accounts by setting the "flags" registry key to 1920. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0301 | 1 Ipswitch | 1 Imail | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Ipswitch IMAIL server 6.02 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via the AUTH CRAM-MD5 command. | |||||
| CVE-2001-1281 | 1 Ipswitch | 1 Imail | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Web Messaging Server for Ipswitch IMail 7.04 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to change information for other users by modifying the olduser parameter in the "Change User Information" web form. | |||||
| CVE-2001-1286 | 1 Ipswitch | 1 Imail | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Ipswitch IMail 7.04 and earlier stores a user's session ID in a URL, which could allow remote attackers to hijack sessions by obtaining the URL, e.g. via an HTML email that causes the Referrer to be sent to a URL under the attacker's control. | |||||
| CVE-2005-2160 | 1 Ipswitch | 1 Imail | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IMail stores usernames and passwords in cleartext in a cookie, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2004-2423 | 1 Ipswitch | 1 Imail | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Unknown vulnerability in the Web calendaring component of Ipswitch IMail Server before 8.13 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via "specific content." | |||||
| CVE-2001-1211 | 1 Ipswitch | 1 Imail | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Ipswitch IMail 7.0.4 and earlier allows attackers with administrator privileges to read and modify user alias and mailing list information for other domains hosted by the same server via the (1) aliasadmin or (2) listadm1 CGI programs, which do not properly verify that an administrator is the administrator for the target domain. | |||||